Origins and Causes of the Cold War

- Why the iron shroud desc endinged pedigrees and causes of the cold fight ROHAN SINGH phratry 2012 Name of University The West Bengal National University of Juridical eruditions SubjectPolitical Science Date of Submission1st October, 2012. Why the Iron curtain descended A study into the origins and causes of the cold war INTRODUCTION On April 16, 1947, Bernard Baruch, former consultant to former U. S.Presidents, Harry Truman and Woodrow Wilson came up with the term dust-covered War to thread the breakdown in relations amidst the ii superpowers at the time-the unite States of America and the Soviet fusion. Historian Walter Lippman, his friend used it in the naked York herald Tribune-which marked its introduction in popular media. This reciprocal antagonism between the two nations manifested itself, non in only-out war but in attacks by means of sparing sanctions, proxy wars, the building of alliances propaganda warfare, engaged in an overarching principle of non-c ooperation.In this context, before delving into the causes, which this essay seeks to do, it is imperative to note that the f effect that the two superpowers fought on the same side during domain of a function War II was nothing but a marriage of convenience, where they were united against the common opposite rather than on grounds of a common cause. The suspicions, ensuing ascribable to the differences in ideology and motives on the global scale had not been jam by any means, merely erased for the time being. THE BREAKDOWN OF THE MARRIAGE OF doohic light uponTo fully understand the origins of the crisp War and the breakdown in relations,it is infallible for us to consider the Yalta, Potsdam and capital of Iran conferences that occurred towards the dying stages of the jiffy World War. The capital of Iran Conference held in 1943 was attended by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin and even though, the leadership went to Tehran with different goals in mind, the quintessential ob jective, which was to open a second look against Germany, was achieved. The big three met again in Yalta in February, 1945.Relations again seemed affable and the three leaders agreed on various key points, such as the formation of the unite Nations, punishment of the Nazi war criminals, the course of instruction of Germany and Berlin into four zones, the holding of free elections in Eastern europium. Yet, there were unassured signs foreshadowing the origin of the Cold War as the three disagreed just somewhat what was to be done about Poland. Stalins demand that the Soviet Union should be given all land atomic number 99 of the Oder-Neisse Line was not interpreted too favorably by the other two leaders.When they met at Potsdam again in July 1945, relations were not so amicable. Various changes had taken place in the inter subject stage since Yalta. Firstly, the Soviet Unions Red Army had taken authorization of the Baltic States under the seeming of liberating them. Secondl y, both the United States and Great Britain had different leaders representing them. Attlee replaced Churchill and Truman replaced Roosevelt. Both the wise leaders were far more suspicious of Stalin and his red agenda than their predecessors had been. Fourthly, the Americans had already tested an atom bomb on July 16, 1945.While Stalin was informed of this development at the conference, the motive behind the Manhatten Project was a manifestation of the suspicion the leaders harbored towards the Communist as they wanted to ensure that Japan was invaded by them and not the Soviet Union. Truman also disagreed with Stalins request for a Soviet battleground of function and kept on pressing for free elections in the change state states of Eastern Europe, which Stalin objected to on grounds of Soviet security. The expansion of the USSR east of the Oder-Neisse bend in Poland remained a topic of dispute.The setting up of a brass in Poland that recognized all three powers, termed as a probationary Government of National Unity (also known as the Lublin Poles), which effectively rendered the cultivation government in exile a thing of the past was another(prenominal) source of conflict. WHO WAS TO BLAME FOR THE COLD state of war? regular army, USSR OR SIMPLE political theory? Now, we come to the three schools of thought on the origins of the Cold War. The traditionalists, led by the eminent historian George Kennan believe that the Stalin and USSR were to blame, owing to their agenda, which involved expanding Communism and establishing control over all the Eastern-European tates. In the 1960s and 1970s, Russian historians, who propounded the revisionist view believed that the United States were to blame for the war as the leaders had become paranoid about Communist aggression, whereas Stalins motives were purely defensive and the establishment of his sphere of influence in Eastern Europe was justified on grounds that USSR had suffered write in code economic los ses during the war and it seemed prudent to ensure that neighboring states werent hostile.This view became more popular during the 1960s and 1970s as the implicit in(p) paranoia regarding both the immaterial and internal Communist Threat, better known as The Red scare away, propounded by the Senator Joseph McCarthysubsided in the United States and people become exceptionally critical of American foreign policywith the emergence of the Vietnam War. The third view, which is accepted by most historians across the globe, including this author is the post-revisionist view, which says that it would be unfair to blame the origin of the Cold War on any of the sides without placing equal blame on the other.Furthermore, to fully understand, the causes behind the Cold War, we need to consider a plurality of factors. Firstly, the World War II had a detrimental impact on the economies of both Britain and France and neither of them were the superpowers they had once been. Thus, the USA and th e USSR were now the remaining superpowers, two superpowers, which had starkly different and almost contradictory ideologies on government and economics. The Soviet system of government was a Communist one based on the Marxist principles of equality and the welfare state, which involved central planning at the expense of individual freedom.On the other hand, the United States was a capitalist democracy, which espouses the self-possession of private wealth, embedded in the pursuit of profits, at the expense of economic disparity. This also led to a breakdown in communication. Every act was construed by the other superpower to be a propaganda move to deflower the other. The Truman Doctrine, which vowed to provide soldiers aid to European states from internal or external aggression and the marshal Plan, largely responsible for the economic rebuilding of Europe were interpreted, perhaps rightly, by the Soviet Union as means of spread USAs capitalist agenda.Stalin responded to the cap italist expansionist agenda of the Marshall Plan by setting up the Council for Mutual Economic assistant (COMECON) to economically aid the members of the Eastern Block. ACTION AND REACTIONCOLD WAR CONFLICTS FROM 1945-1960 Each superpower wanted to spread their specific ideology and extend the others, which resulted in a number of propaganda measures, alliancesand proxy wars. The first major(ip) cold war conflict was the Berlin blockade and airlift of 1948-49.Stalin cut of all transport links to West Berlin, which was under Allied Control, and so tender of all food supplies to the city. Truman ordered an airlift with food supplies through B-52 bombers, thus ensuring that the population and autonomy of the zone were kept alive. In 1949, Stalin called of the blockade. The iron curtain-which was a symbol of both ideological and tangible division between Eastern and Western Europe became permanent and the weapons race started to peck up pace.The western nations were convinced of what a potential threat the Soviets could be, which prompted the USA to supplement its military deployment with political affiliations by signing the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in April, 1949, emphasizing the principle of collective self-defense. This, on with the rearmament of The Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany, which was in the Allied Zone) was met with the creation of the Warsaw accordance in 1955. The Soviets also set up a Communist breeding Bureau (Cominform), which served as a forum that gathered all communistic Eastern Bloc nations.Throughout the 1950s, both countries continued to build up their military arsenal- of both conventional and nuclear weapons. This form of action and reaction due to high levels of suspicion and hostility towards the other played a key role in laying the foundations of the Cold War that ensued. The final Cold War Conflict of the 1950s which laid down the foundation for the tautness that would exist in a divided Europe for the next cardinal years was the Berlin Crisis, which ensued from 1958-61.In 1961, The Soviet Union constructed a wall between east and West Germany in the heart of Berlin. Khrushchev claimed that it was an attempt to curb the expansion of western influence of fascist attempting to influence the mindset of the people of East Germany through brainwashing and coercion. However, most historians believe that it was simply an attempt to curb the exodus of many immigrants (a number that has been pegged at 3. 5 million before the complex body part of The Wall) to West Germany, which was doing much better economically.Throughout the Cold War, the war was a physical representation of the divide across the iron curtain and an emblem of the conflicts that it represented. final stage THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND THE BEGINNING OF A NEW human being ORDER The years 1945-1960 laid down the foundations for the period of international and diplomatic tensions that would ensue between the two superpo wers. While, all-out- war- never broke out, the two countries policies of containment and brinksmanship brought them exclude to it on many occasions, such as during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.Of course, the Cuban Missile crisis also helped in improving communication ties and kickstarted the process of arms limitation by the setting up of measures such as the partial test ban treaty in 1963 and the Moscow-Washington hotline. The period 1969-79 saw a thaw in relations between the two superpowers- a period known as detente, which ended with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. The end of the Cold War, which was marked by the fall of the berlin Wall in 1989 and the dissipation of the Soviet Union in 1991 led to a new foundation order.In this new era, there has generally been a decrease in inter-state conflicts but other threats to international piece such as conflicts of ethnicity, religion, militancy and terrorist act are still rampant. Communal tensions in regions s uch as Sudan, Somalia and the congou are latest epitomes of this form of conflict and to truly establish a framework of international piece it will be imperative for national governments, in conjunction with the United Nations to make addressing such issues a priority. BIBLIOGRAPHY Arthur gladness Lane. I saw Poland betrayed An American Ambassador Reports to the American People.Indianapolis TheBobbs-Merrill Company, 1948. pp. 5. Church, George, liberty The Berlin Wall,Time. easy at (Accessed twenty-ninth folk,2012. ) Cleary,Helen and Edwards,Phil (2005),Fact FilePotsdam Conference. BBC Archives. Availableat (Accessed 28th September 2012. ) Czechoslovakia A dry land Study, Glenn E. Curtis, ed. (Washington, D. C. Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress, 1992. )Church, George,Freedom The Berlin Wall,Time. Available at (Accessed 29th September,2012. ) Glass,Andrew (2010)Bernard baruch coins the term Cold War. Politico. Available at http//www. politico. com/news/stori es/0410/35862. html ( Accessed 26th September, 2010. ) Fried, Albert (1997). McCarthyism, The Great American Red Scare A Documentary History. Oxford University Press. pp10. Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering new-fangled World History. quaternary ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 130. Scott,Lenn(2001) planetary history 1900-90. n Baylis, Jon and Smith, Steve (2001),The globalization of world politicsAn introduction to international relations. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press. London. pp55-63. Yilmaz,Muzaffer (2008),The untested World OrderAn outline of the Post Cold-War Era,Turkish daybook of International Relations. v. 7(4) Available at http//www. alternativesjournal. net/volume7/Number4/myilmaz. pdf (Accessed 1st October,2012. ) 2 . Glass,Andrew (2010)Bernard baruch coins the term Cold War. Politico( Accessed 26th September, 2010. 3 . Ibid 4 . Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4thed.Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 122. 5 . Churchill, Winston Spencer (1951). The Second World War Closing the Ring. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. pp. 642. 6 . Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 123. 7 . Ibid 8 . The elections were held during the Conference and Churchill was replaced midway through the Conference. SeeLowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 122. 9 . Cleary,Helen and Edwards,Phil (2005),Fact FilePotsdam Conference. BBC Archives (Accessed 28th September 2012) 10 .Arthur Bliss Lane. I saw Poland betrayed An American Ambassador Reports to the American People. Indianapolis The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1948. 11 . Supra note 5 12 . ibid 13 . Fried, Albert (1997). McCarthyism, The Great American Red Scare A Documentary History. Oxford University Press. 14 . Supra note 5 15 . Scott,Lenn(2001)International history 1900-90. in Baylis, Jon and Smith, Steve (2001),The globalization of world politicsAn introduction to international relations. 2nded. Oxford University Press. London. pp55-63. 16 . Czechoslovakia A Country Study, Glenn E. Curtis, ed. (Washington, D.C. Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress, 1992. ) 17 . Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 130. 18 . Supra note 14 19 . Lowe,Norman (2005)Mastering Modern World History. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan Publishers. London. pp. 130. 20 . Church, George,Freedom The Berlin Wall,Time (Accessed 29th September 2012) 21 . Supra note 14 22 . ibid 23 . Yilmaz,Muzaffer (2008),The New World OrderAn outline of the Post Cold-War Era,Turkish Journal of International Relations. v. 7(4) (Accessed 1st October,2012)