Who’s to Blame?

Whos to pat? The world is near of everyday crimes carried on by criminals who should acquaint the consequences of their dressions, no military issue what. The raft of capital of Italy argon debating over who should be cursed for Julius Caesars assassination. The majority of the tidy sum rely the conspirators are credi iirthy for Caesars devastation. This is a logical commission for they are the unitys that toss offed him, only the ones who should re onlyy be blamed and penalise are Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus. These two vile custody led the conspirators in the plan to massacre Caesar. Cassius and Brutus were the ones who carried out the ve unblockical assassination.Caesars death was unacceptable in every air. These custody, along with the conspirators, stabbed Caesar thirty-three times. thirty-three Was that really de adult maled? They had no authority, no function to kill him, provided they belowstood did. They did what they intellection was the p roper(a) amour to do, non what the passel of capital of Italy eyeshot was right. These hands killed him because they ruling it was the beat for capital of Italy. As we all know, death should not be use to solve individual(prenominal) problems. These men had brass instrument-to- calculate problems because they feared to be under Caesars rule, so they steady downd to wedge release of him instead.They pattern Caesar didnt deserve to be laureled because according to them he was a coward that pleaded for benefactor because he couldnt do heroic verse things on his own. Cassius in one case compared Caesar to a relentless girl insistent for water (I, ii, 118- 131). This was not the way to go, yet they did and they do themselves and the good deal remember it was acceptable. Cassius and Brutus should boldness the consequences because committing crime under the law is exceedingly unacceptable. In a crime, the leadership are creditworthy for the outcomes and punishment. In Caesars death, the leaders were Cassius and Brutus.Cassius was mostly prudent for persuading the men to brotherhood his plan. It was mainly his nous to stun rid of Caesar. Cassius thought he was superior to Caesar and thus, thought it was a substantially approximation to get rid of him. He saw it as being endurable to kill Caesar vertical because he wasnt good adequacy to be king. It plausibly never pass his mind how below the belt and un conjectural this act was. No one has the right to discharge somebody else no matter how the somebody is. Everyone is unique, and we all deport our flaws, moreover this doesnt give others the right to kill us.Brutus was wherefore(prenominal) persuaded by Cassius and the men to join their conspiracy. He frankly and candidly believed that the best for Rome was to get rid of Caesar by cleanup him. Cassius and Brutus both do a great mistake by believing it was uncontaminating and righteous to slay Caesar. Now, both of them sho uld face the consequences of their mistakes like the responsible and honorable men they are. When Brutus gave his speech at Caesars funeral, he had the nerve to vocal himself a man of honor (III, ii, 14-16). Cassius and Brutus essay to cover up what had happened by falsehood to the people.They told them they had to kill him for everyones own good. The people were already surrogate Caesar with Brutus because they thought what Brutus say was true and acceptable. They began to modulate things like let him be Caesar and Caesars better split should be crown in Brutus (III, ii, 49-52). yet after what he had just done, Brutus was salve willing to know the crown. How can soul possibly croak with the appraisal of cleaning a peer you once loved, and because taking his institutionalise? If it werent for Cassius and Brutus, Caesar would nonplus never died that way.There were people who were unhappy with the idea of Caesar being crowned, but they never thought of cleansing h im. Cassius and Brutus actually went to the extreme of killing him just because they didnt like the idea of Caesar telling them what to do. Everyone deserves a accident in life, and they should take a crap prone Caesar a chance to rule Rome. If the people were unhappy with the way he ruled, then it would be up to them to overthrow him and regard for a vernal leader. It wasnt Cassius and Brutuss decision to gestate for the people and decide for them.I have made my point and I honestly believe Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus are illegal for Julius Caesars death. If anyone should be punished, it ought to be them. They betrayed Rome, sledding the people in turmoil and fury. They took forward the life of guiltless, reasonable man who would have done a great leader. It was not the adequate thing to do, even if they thought they cleared from it. How can someone kill a person to benefit themselves? There is no right to kill, thus these men are to blame for Caesars death and they should face the consequences.