Campaign Finance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Campaign finance - Essay ExampleThe Supreme Court Case Citizens United vs. Federal Election counselling did boom the free speech rights to the corporations. However, in the light of the doubts raised by the documentary Big Sky, Big bullion and a thorough perusal of the views of Justice Anthony Kennedy and Justice John Paul Stevens in the given case, it would be pragmatic and fair to say that corporations should not have the free speech rights as the individual citizens and oftentimes more needs to be done to protect the American elections from the go of orotund money. The big question is to decide as to what extent the personification of corporations should be allowed in a democratic society deal the US? This question needs to be analyzed in the light of the assertion make by Justice Stevens that the special characteristics of the corporate structure require particularly careful regulation in an electoral context (Stevens 301). Thereby, the one salient characteristic of corpo rations is the kind of financial wherewithal they have at their disposal, to influence the outcomes of an election. This doubt needs to be approached in the context of the claim made by Professor David Parker of t State University in the documentary Big Sky, Big Money that in Montana elections, almost 68 % of the money being ascribed to the election campaigns could be traced to outside groups, who are taking the advantage of the Citizens United vs. ... It exactly amounts to a base and shallow playing with the statutory rules to pump corporate money into the election campaigns of the postulate candidates, as Rodell Mollineou, the President of the research group American Bridge extending services to 501C4 groups like WTP blatantly asserts in the documentary that I am playing by the rules given to me (Frontline 1). Thereby, the Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission in a way gave a free hand to the corporations to use the pecuniary power at their disposal, to extend the muc h needed financial brawn to the candidates whose views happen to be in tandem with their designs. public treasury today the biggest obstacle before the corporate interference in the American election system was the contend as to How to use money to effect elections without disclosing where money is coming from (Frontline 1). The Supreme Court decision in one stroke ameliorated this impediment by declaring corporate financing of private issue advocacy groups like WTP to be legal. The other salient hassle before the corporate interference in the election butt on was the onus of endowing this criminal practice with a moral justification. However the premise lay down by the Supreme Court decision that the independent corporate election expenditure aided the cause of republic by increasing the number of issues discussed, the depth of their exploration, and the size of the audience reached (Kennedy 296), further facilitated the corporate electoral intentions. As was expected, this dec ision provided the much needed fuel to the corporate lobbyists like the campaign finance attorney jam Bopp to accrue the much required