Morally Ambiguous Characters in Fyodor Dostoevskys Crime and Punishmen

Of ten dollar bill times in literature, we argon presented with quintessential characters that be any placed into the conventional categories of either technical or bad. In these pieces, we are usually able to differentiate the characters and discover their true intentions from reading precisely a few chapters. However, in some remarkable pieces of work, authors create characters that are so realistic and so complex that we are unable to severalise them as purely good or evil. In the novel discourtesy and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoevsky develops the chastely ambiguous characters of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov to provide us with an interesting read and to bless us a chance to evaluate each character. Svidrigailov is one of the closely unfathomable characters in Crime and Punishment. As the novel goes on, Svidrigailovs interestingness of Dunya progresses into sheer harassment. After eavesdropping on Raskolnikovs confession to Sonya, he uses his newly acquired information to lure Dunya into his room. Svidrigailov proceeds to promise help to Raskolnikov if she go away shit him her hand in marriage. He then threatens to rape her when she tries to run away. even off when Svidrigailov appears to be purely evil, he surprises us all when his rational side kicks in and allows Dunya to leave. Although he may seem to be the cold-hearted villain of the book, his good deeds cannot go unnoticed. It cannot be forgotten that he is willing to go across Dunya the three thousand rubbles in his wifes will and offers ten thousand rubbles to help Dunya because he thinks her marriage will be a disadvantage to her in the end. Once Katerina Ivanonva dies, Svidrigailov also promises to pay for the funeral arrangements and to provide for the children, who will be sent to an orphanage. Although... ...ing to compensate for them. As his guilt is almost do eating him inside and out, Raskolnikov finally admits and with a new love, he points his sprightliness in a w hole new direction. Svidrigailovs moral ambiguity seems to play a smaller part in the whole skeleton than Raskolnikovs, making a subplot for the story and adding details to make it more exciting. If these characters were twain purely evil, and had no guilt whatsoever, this would be simply a deadening story of unhinged men. Adding both good and evil sides to an individual adds a little something extra to the story that distinguishes it from many other pieces of literature. Aside from adding to the storyline, these morally ambiguous characters give students a chance to practice their skill at analyzing characters and think for themselves, forming their own outlooks on the characters and the book as a whole.