Affects of Gender on Intelligence

The Effect of Gender on an IQ spacial knowledge establishment Intelligence is the cap magnate to take in new in hitation and alter to situations. It is derived from both genetics and environment. Genetics be the part that genes play in a persons life. It is also questi mavend that different aims of different types of cognition be based on whether a person is male or female. Howard Gardner declareed that there are multiple types of preaching, those of which are linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, spatial, bodily-kinaesthetic, naturalistic, interpersonal and intrapersonal.These intelligences make up the IQ of an individual. Types of intelligences * Linguistic the ability one has with of words. * Logical-mathematical the use calculation. * Musical penetrate and rhythm. * spatial the use of spacing and where the placing of things are in comparison to one an separate. * Bodily-Kinaesthetic the use of body and motion. * Naturalistic the awareness one has with their na tural environment. * interpersonal the use of interaction with other people. * Intrapersonal the understanding of ones self.A previous try out conducted shows the differences between levels of spatial intelligence in males and females and how it can be changed, stating that the findings found that playing an action video game can intimately eliminate this sex activity difference in spatial attention and simultaneously decrease the sexual urge disparity in mental rotation ability (Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in spatial acquaintance 1990). It stated that women benefited more than men. The aim of this try out is to investigate the magnetic core of gender on multiple types of intelligence, specifically spatial intelligence.Hypothesis It is believed that the majority of males come more spatial intelligence than females. Independent Variables gender Dependent Variables level of intelligence Method Participants Equal amount of 12 girls and 12 boys from the devil current (2013) Year 11 Loyola College Psychology classes aged 16 to 17 years. Materials * Task Sheet * Computers with internet * IQ examine handout surgery As Seen on social unit 2 Psychology APS 2 firing 1 earned run average Intelligence Task Sheet (refer to appendix) 1. You go forth form a pair where the maiden person ordain do beat up 1 and the 2nd give do stir up 2. 2. Person 1 Go to the website below complete the quiver ttp//www. onlinejigsawpuzzles. net/animals_14_polar_bear. htm 3. Record the judgment of conviction required to complete the test and gender of the participant on the control panel attached. 4. Person 2 to go to the below website and repeated the forge preceding(prenominal) http//www. onlinejigsawpuzzles. net/animals_11_parrot. htm 5. nary(prenominal) complete the questions 1-10 on the IQ quiz handout on logical reason. 6. Correct your questions. 7. Give your results mesa to each Mr Hong or Ms Ray so that the result may be collated. Results Spatial Test Scores Table Test Score No. of Girls No. of Boys 8 1 3 7 4 2 6 1 2 5 5 4 4 0 1 3 1 0Mean Girls 5. 83 Boys 6. 16 Median Girls 5. 5 Boys 6 Mode Girls 5 Boys 5 graphical record Statement of Table and chart These results are from a Spatial Intelligence test. The highest prepares given were four eights one of which was achieved by a female and the other three by males. The lowest score given to females was a three and the lowest score given to males was a four. On clean males scored higher(prenominal) than females with the average score for both categories (male and female) being a score of five. Jigsaw Puzzle Times Table Times in transactions No. of Girls No. of Boys 400 459 3 0 500 559 3 4 00 659 3 4 700 759 0 2 800 859 1 2 900 959 2 0 Mean For girls and boys 600 659 Median Girls 500 to 559 Boys 600 to 659 Mode Girls 400 459, 500 559, 600 659 Boys 500 559, 600 659 Graph (in minutes) (in minutes) Statement of Table and Graph The Jigsaw Puzzle period results swerved from higher up four minutes to below 10 minutes. The specific male range was between five minutes to 8 minutes and 59 seconds. everyplace half of both males and females scored between 5 minutes and 6 minutes 59 seconds. The quickest time and the longest time were both accurate by females. countersign In this experiment the hypothesis was clog uped in the Spatial awareness test with the majority of males performing at a higher level of spatial intelligence compared to females besides not supported in the Puzzle as the majority of females finished their puzzles in a shorter time than males. In the spatial intelligence tests the males had a higher average than females with a quarter of the males achieving the top score compared to the one female. This is not as much shown in the puzzle completion times where, although the lowest score was achieved by a female, the highest score was ompleted by a female as good as the majority of the shortest times were done by females. Males had a littler range though, with their scores a little more consistent than females. These results suggest that males do tend to support more spatial awareness compared to females but does not mean that there are not elisions to this suggestion. This may because males, oddly within the age range selected for this experiment, have a higher propensity to be playing action video games which in earlier experiments have suggested can improve and maintain a higher level of spatial awareness.Variables could include the past experience of the subjects including interests, availability to mind games and tuition, previous intelligence tests conducted, etc. as well as the mood and energy of the person and the time the test was conducted. Improvements could include having all subjects tested at the aforesaid(prenominal) time and under quitter conditions without communication. No ethical consideration was given with the exception of the task sheet briefing for the subjects. No debriefing or acknowledgment of agreement to the experiment was given.As the participants were under the age of 18 an improvement for attached time would be to have parental consent to the participation of the experiment. It is reason out that in this experiment males showed a higher ability in spatial awareness. This information suggests that gender does in fact have an effect on intelligence levels but does not mean that there are not exceptions to this suggestion. References * Feng J. , Spence I. , & Pratt J. (1990) Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Edwards R. , Blaher-Lucas E. , Marangio K. , Moore V. (2010) Oxford Psychology Units 1 & 2 Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Appendices Appendix 1 Link to puzzle page Appendix 2 Participant info/Raw info Unit 2 Psychology AOS 2 firing 1 ERA Intelligence The Task To investigate the effect of ge nder on multiple types of intelligence, specifically spatial awareness. You will conduct the experiment along the following guidelines. 8. You will form a pair where the 1st person will do puzzle 1 and the 2nd will do puzzle 2. 9.Person 1 Go to the website below complete the puzzle http//www. onlinejigsawpuzzles. net/animals_14_polar_bear. htm. 10. Record the time required to complete the test and gender of the participant on the table attached. 11. Pearson 2 to go to the below website and repeate the process above http//www. onlinejigsawpuzzles. net/animals_11_parrot. htm 12. Now complete the questions 1-10 on the IQ quiz handout on logical reason. 13. Correct your questions. 14. Give your results table to either Mr Hong or Ms Ray so that the result may be collated. The Written accountThe compose report essential be written under the following headings Title launch Method Results Discussion/ refinement References Appendices each(prenominal) aspects of this ERA will be complete d at home. You will be given the ERA in the last week of destination 3. The final ERA will be due via email on the 19th of October. If you wish to hand in a draft of the ERA it must be given to your teacher by 5th October. Introduction (250-500 words)- The introduction must provide * Rationale for this experiment * geographic expedition and countersign of any key theories and concepts related to this experiment from past research. denomination and discussion of the key concepts manifold in this experiment that can be employ to explain the results * Stated aim of the experiment * Identification of the dependent and strong-minded variables of the experiment * A stated operational hypothesis Method (150 words)- The manner must include * Participants, Materials, Procedure written according to research lab Report conventions * Information regarding the characteristics of your experimental design, participant selection and reference to ethical appendage Results (no word limit)- The results must include At least one annotated table and an overall statement of results. This must be manipulated in order to pledge it in a fashion that is ideal for the manner in which you will interpret the data in your discussion Discussion/Conclusion (400-600 words)- The Discussion/Conclusions must include * A reference to the support or unsupported operational hypothesis * A valid justification for your opinion * legitimate inferences from the raw data and results * A discussion regarding how the ideas provided in the introduction are supported or not by your findings * Generalization of findings * Extraneous/mutually exclusive variables Conclusion and possible improvements As a final note * The ground limit must be adhered to with a 10% variation both ways. Excess words will not be considered in the rank process (the title, abstract, results, all in-text references, graph/table titles and annotations, appendices and final reference lists are not included in word count) * All work must utilize in-text referencing (Harvard Style) and provide references * All work must be typed in size 12 (Calibri or Times New Roman font) * All tables, graphs and pictures must be labeled and annotated * Appendices must be included.If referred to in your Lab Report, there must be a clear indication as to which specific areas of the appendices is being utilized. * PLAGARISM FROM ANY RESOURCE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Any identified plagiarism will result in that partitioning of the Lab Report being removed and not considered in the rank process. In the case of work being copied from another student, BOTH students involved will face disciplinary actions based upon VCAA guidelines that may result in an N grade for Unit 2 Psychology.Grade Criteria and Structure for SAC 1b Unit 2 Psychology Name Criteria Introduction 5 4 3 2 1 0 Identification and exploration of superordinate goals and other theories and concepts germane(predicate) to the experiment Evidence of resea rch and explanation of concepts relevant to the experiment. Identification and use of IV and DV in an operational hypothesis TOTAL /15 Criteria Method 5 4 3 2 1 0Identification of key process in developing a method Identification and explanation of the utilized experimental design TOTAL /10 Criteria Results 5 4 3 2 1 0 office to manipulate raw data into a meaningful format and show (Creation and use of accurate data graphs and tables) Accurate identification of key statistical information from raw data (Mean, median, mode and/or other relevant statistics) TOTAL /10Criteria Discussion and Conclusion 5 4 3 2 1 0 Accurate and justified identification of support/no support for operational hypothesis Proposed explanation of results in recounting to acquired data Proposed explanation of results in relation to researched theories and concepts relevant to the experiment Exploration of the relevance of the results to the areas of red ucing prejudice Identification and discussion of extraneous variables and improvements to the experiment Identification and summation of general conclusions to the population based upon the established data TOTAL /30 Criteria Overall Requirements 5 4 3 2 1 0 Quality of referencing and research, and overall written quality and exhibit of the ERA TOTAL /5 Total Score /70 ( %) Comments transcription table Gender (male/female) Time (in seconds) Participant 1 Participant 2 ______________________________________________________________________________ Articles for your reference in completing this ERA Go to the following associate to read articles related to spatial intelligence and gender. http//pss. sagepub. com/content/18/10/850. full http//pss. sagepub. com/content/4/1/35. full. pdf+htmlThe following websites contain information on multiple intelligences http//www. tecweb. org/styles/gardner. html http//www. infed. org/thinkers/gardner. htm Raw DataFema le Participants Gender Score on test Jigsaw puzzle time 1 f 7 507 2 f 5 448 3 f 7 442 4 f 7 625 5 f 5 935 6 f 5 933 7 f 8 458 8 f 3 816 9 f 7 527 10 f 5 640 11 f 5 624 12 f 6 543 Male Participants Gender Score on test Jigsaw puzzle time 1 m 7 510 2 m 6 631 3 m 8 600 4 m 7 622 5 m 5 839 6 m 8 548 7 m 5 604 8 m 8 518 9 m 5 721 10 m 5 739 11 m 6 539 12 m 4 817